From Paper to Computer to Paper
Introduction: An outline of how we got to where we are
- From Paper
- Requesting Daily Field Notes and Activity Logs from the State
of Fl. 1960-1988
- Organized log sheets from 1989 to 1996
- Requested Data for Location of all Beach Markers used by State
of Fl.
- Field notes from Jim Dunbar with hand written locations
- Convert data to state plans coordinates for plotting
- To Computer
- Data Entry, Data Entry, Data Entry
- Entering data from daily field notes for artifact
locations based on sextant readings off beach markers
- Entering data for Empty Hole locations
- Conversion, Conversion, Conversion
- Using Excel Spreadsheet and Corpscon convert large Access
Database data locations for markers & artifacts &
empty holes to State Planes and then to Lat and Lon
- Using Ms Access and Word Mail Merge convert data to ASCII
text for scripts files used by AutoCAD for plotting
- To Paper
- Plotting new Lat and Lon positions using AutoCAD and HP
Plotter
- Plot locations using different colors for type of material
found
- Adding attributes to plots for more information on each
artifact
- Inserting background Geo Referenced Aerial Photos allows
for visual referencing to rock outcrops and landmarks
- Adding a grid to 1/1000 of a Minute
- Allows artifacts and empty holes to be read from and
plotted to a base map
- Scaling of the map allows easy distance measurements
Conclusion: A LOT OF PEOPLE, A LOT OF
WORK, A LOT OF TIME,
TO FIND A LOT OF TREASURE!!
NO MATTER WHERE YOU GO THERE YOU ARE!
In 1994, Taffi Fisher Abt asked me if it would be possible to take all
of the old data, from daily log sheets, for the Florida East Coast
Shipwreck Project beginning in early 1960's and by way of computer
programs use that data to produce good base-maps. The results would be
to see where artifacts, from the 1715 fleet as well as other wrecks,
were being found. "I just want to tell the computer to show me a
trail of treasure found on all the sites and up comes a map." This
started a project that, to this date, has evolved into 7 years of work
by many dedicated people. I would like to thank the entire Mel Fisher
organization for the opportunity to be one of those involved in such a
project, as well as the countless others, who without their help, this
undertaking would not be where it is today.
There have been a number of reports written by
us concerning the use of the DGPS system for plotting archaeological
finds. They go into the mathematics and methodology of how the data was
converted and then plotted onto a base map. (Correlating the Past with
the Future:….C. Gaither, K. Nehiley and B. Moore), (Standardization of
Mapping and Archiving… Florida East Coast Shipwreck Project 2000
Season Report). How we are now using this new way of looking at that
data has become a three-fold outlook. The first is to the ongoing
salvage operation, which year after year continues to produce artifacts
both ordinary and unique. The second is to the archaeological aspects of
the Florida East Coast Shipwreck Project, and third to the sharing of
the data with the public.
The first way to find new areas, which may
produce artifacts, is to know where artifacts have been found as well as
where other salvage attempts have been made. By organizing the data by
the type of material, we are able to see, all the gold, all the silver,
all the artifacts and empty holes depending on the type. Below is a list
for types of materials.
|
TYPES |
| AN |
ANCHOR |
| BN |
BONE |
| CA |
CANNON |
| CC |
COPPER COIN |
| CR |
CERAMIC |
| CU |
CUPROUS |
| EH |
EMPTY HOLE |
| GC |
GOLD COIN |
| GD |
GOLD |
| GL |
GLASS |
| GS |
GEM STONE |
| IR |
IRON |
| LD |
LEAD |
| OR |
ORGANIC |
| PW |
PEWTER |
| SC |
SILVER COIN |
| SL |
SILVER |
| ST |
STONE |
| UN |
UNKNOWN |
| WD |
WOOD |
Plotting this data over all the empty excavations, the salvor can then
see areas, that produce a higher concentration of a certain type of
material or a trail of artifacts leading to new areas, which have not
been searched. The tools that brings all this into real time is the
base-map and DGPS. The salvor is equipped with a DGPS system on board
the salvage vessel, which is calibrated to read in Latitude and
Longitude degrees minutes and decimal minutes to 1/1000 of a minute NAD
83 (an equivalent of 6 feet in latitude or 5.36 feet in longitude). The
grid on the base-map is set in Latitude and Longitude to 1/1000 of a
minute NAD 83. Therefore, by using the base-map and DGPS the salvor has
a precise look at the wreck site and the position of the salvage vessel.
Tools that until now have been unavailable to the salvage community.
Figure two shows a section of the base-map and the grid.

Figure: 2 - Base map and
grid
Although essential to the salvor, a base-map showing types of material
found only begins to tell the story. To get a closer look we have added
the use of categories along with the type of material. This allows us to
see the wrecks also in a new way. Where the salvor would see, only a large
concentration of lead or iron objects, by associating those types to a
category of ammo we see a large concentration of lead musket balls and
iron cannon balls. By adding certain category together such as ammo,
armaments, edged weapon and firearm we would get a base-map which may show
an area where the armory may have wrecked. Selecting categories based on
personal artifacts such as jewelry, we not only see areas of gold and
silver, which would belong to the more affluent passengers, but jewelry
made of cuprous materials, belonging to the less well to do and crew
members. Showing categories based on the different structural areas of the
ship, (Archaeological Overview of Surveys and Excavations Conducted on the
Lost Spanish Galleon…..R. Duncan Mathewson III Ph.D. 2000) we can view
either; the stern castle by asking for categories such as jewelry and
navigation; the cargo hull containing the precious cargo; the fore castle
containing artifacts associated with the passengers and crew; the lower
deck with all its cannons; the sail/rigging may be seen by looking at all
the rigging. This gives a more detailed look at the way the ships may have
broken up. Below is a list of categories and there relationship to
different sections of the ship.

| TYPES |
|
CATEGORY |
|
STRUCTURAL AREA |
| AN |
ANCHOR |
|
AMMO |
|
STERN CASTLE |
| BN |
BONE |
|
ANCHOR |
|
|
NAVIGATION |
| CA |
CANNON |
|
ARMAMENT |
|
|
CLOTHING |
| CC |
COPPER COIN |
|
BALLAST |
|
|
FURNITURE |
| CR |
CERAMIC |
|
CANNON |
|
|
JEWELRY |
| CU |
CUPROUS |
|
CARGO |
|
|
PRECIOUS METAL |
| EH |
EMPTY HOLE |
|
CLOTHING |
|
|
SERVICE |
| GC |
GOLD COIN |
|
COINS |
|
|
EDGED WEAPON |
| GD |
GOLD |
|
EDGED WEAPON |
|
LOWER DECKS |
| GL |
GLASS |
|
FASTENER |
|
|
CANNON |
| GS |
GEM STONE |
|
FIREARM |
|
|
ARMAMENT |
| IR |
IRON |
|
FITTING |
|
|
FIREARM |
| LD |
LEAD |
|
FURNITURE |
|
CARGO HULL |
| OR |
ORGANIC |
|
INTRUSION |
|
|
STRUCTURAL |
| PW |
PEWTER |
|
JEWELRY |
|
|
CARGO |
| SC |
SILVER COIN |
|
NATIVE AMERICAN |
|
|
COINS |
| SL |
SILVER |
|
NAVIGATION |
|
|
STORAGE |
| ST |
STONE |
|
NON-STRUCTURAL |
|
|
ORGANIC |
| UN |
UNKNOWN |
|
ORGANIC |
|
|
BALLAST |
| WD |
WOOD |
|
PRECIOUS METAL |
|
|
AMMO |
|
|
|
RIGGING |
|
|
FITTING |
|
|
|
SERVICE |
|
FORE CASTLE |
|
|
|
STORAGE |
|
|
NON-STRUCTURAL TOOL |
|
|
|
STRUCTURAL |
|
WEATHER DECK |
|
|
|
TOOL |
|
|
ANCHOR |
|
|
|
UNKNOWN |
|
SAIL RIGGING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FASTENER |
By using base-maps with type of material,
categories and DGPS locations the archaeologists has a way of getting a
precise look at the wreck site. A look that until now has been unavailable
to the academic community. Figure three shows a section of map with armory
most likely associated with the lower decks of the ship.

Figure: 3 Douglas Beach lower deck scatter
Now if I were not a salvor looking for lost treasures, or I was not a
archeologist looking for relationships between different sections of the
ship, I would find looking at the base-maps about as exciting as watching
my computer defrag. It looks cool but has little meaning. In today's
society of computers and internet access we have a way of sharing the
information gathered by so many people in an instant point and click
environment. I like to refer to these as Interactive Maps. An interactive
map takes us one step beyond the paper maps used by the salvor and
archeologist. It allows the user to become part of the adventure and
excitement of locating, mapping and researching historical shipwrecks. By
way of an AutoCAD Whipp controller, we are able to link the data stored in
large databases, containing information on each artifact, to its precise
location in a format that is used by an Internet browsers. Along with the
database information area of the wreck can be linked to audio or video
files giving us a real life view of recoveries being made, conservation
methods being used or to other web sites for research or fun.
Below is a photo of a base-map done with a whipp
controller. By clicking on the link at the main pile area of the Atocha,
we are able to view a video of Mel and Deo as they received news of
discovery from their son Kane. The viewer not only gets a real sense of
what it was like but where it happened. Users are free to pan, zoom, and
click on any area that is linked bringing the base-map to life.

Figure: 4 - Example of
interactive maps for internet
The viewing of such a tremendous amount of data to be seen in such a
verity of ways is something that has been unavailable to the public until
now.
In 1995, I wrote a paper introducing the use of
the DGPS system in hopes that the State would adopt the use of these new
technologies so the archaeological data for the Florida East Coast
Shipwreck Project could be used as a model for future maritime
archaeological projects. By providing the data in a way that allows the
salvor to find more artifacts by using the DGPS and base-map, to arranging
the data in categories so archaeologists have a better way of studying the
wrecks, to the creation of the Interactive Maps which brings the wreck
sites to life for the public, I feel that The Mel Fisher Center, Inc. and
the countless people involved have indeed created such a model.
Figure: 5 Advances in
methodology

|