We are currently investigating a potential future project to incorporate the possibility of making our maps 3D. Initial research shows that although this has provided a better visualization for professionals and the public audiences, there are clearly disadvantages. Some of the biggest pitfalls include the sheer volume of data and the time required to collect and process it, fragmented or contradictory data collected in the field in the past, and deciding on the level of detail before embarking on the project. For further reading on this we would recommend the DENBEIGH project of the Texas A & M University’s Institute of Nautical Archaeology (see http://nautarch.tamu.edu/PROJECTS/denbeigh) or the Coronation Project.

We are also beginning research on archiving methodology. Of primary concern is the impact of the emerging digital technology on long-term access to material created in digital form. An excellent article, titled "Changing Trains at Wigan: Digital Preservation and the Future of Scholarship" written by Dr. Seamus Ross, University of Glasgow was recently published (Nov.2000) by the National Preservation Office, The British Library, London England. This article identifies and examines the challenges, risks, and expectations of digital preservation, the world’s increasing dependence upon it, and the changes taking place in recording of our world culture. It is noted that without constant upgrading and attention, the "digital information" is susceptible to loss through physical breakdown of the media, or rendered inaccessible by technological advances. It is also noted that information stored in digital form is as delicate as archaeological remains of flora and fauna.

In conclusion, there is much to be done and no way to actually "finish" this project. Technology is moving faster daily and the possibilities are endless. At this time, standardization would probably promote stagnation, yet it continues to be a dream worth chasing.

Article written by: Taffi Fisher Abt

The author wishes to thank the following people for their hard work and assistance on this project. Bill Moore, Catherine Gaither, Charlie Myers, H. Michael Essig, Ken Nehiley, John Tokarz, John Brandon, Greg Bounds, Gary Randolph, Morgan MacRorie, Clyde Kuntz, and the many data entry operators.

The following section summarizes the activities of the Mel Fisher Center, Inc. vessels and subcontractor’s vessels working under contract with Mel Fisher Center, Inc. in the 2000 Season. A total of 463 days were worked by 33 vessels during the 2000 season. A list of the vessels, their captains, contract numbers, and the four-character abbreviation code used in data entry can be seen immediately following this written summary. The listing is in numerical order according to the contract numbers, "C" number. Immediately following the list of the vessels is an analysis of the days worked in the 2000 season. This list breaks down the days by type of activity performed. The following is a definition of the abbreviations used in the analysis for the various types of activities.

Grand totals can be found at the end of the analysis as well as charts depicting the types of days worked and the breakdown of total days worked on each of the sites.